|
and to Invoke the General Superintendence of the Court* *Good for when no other legal alternative is available for relief.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
COUNTY, SS. CIVIL ACTION NO. ______ ----------------------------------------
INSERT COURT NAME
MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
The plaintiff respectfully requests this Honorable Court to enter an Order staying all proceedings in the insert name of court in Criminal Case No.8853 CR 4268, in accordance with the first request for relief contained in the plaintiff's complaint filed herewith.
Respectfully submitted,
Date: ____________
__________________________________
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
COUNTY, SS. CIVIL ACTION NO. ______ ----------------------------------------
INSERT COURT NAME
COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF A
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This is an action to invoke the general superintendence
of this Court to
Plaintiff seeks reversal of the District Court's orders that the marginally indigent plaintiff (defendant in the criminal case below) must pay his $250.00 contribution to appointed attorney's fees in a lump sum rather than in installments, that he not be allowed to exercise his right to a first-instance jury trial prior to paying in one lump-sum the $250.00 attorney-fee assessment, that he be denied appointed counsel because of his inability to pay the $250.00 in one lump-sum, that he not be allowed to keep the same appointed counsel that was assigned to him at his arraignment. JURISDICTION 1. Jurisdiction is conferred upon this Court by M.G.L. c. 211, sec. 3, insert chapter and section or code identifier of your state's law, which allows a party aggrieved by an interlocutory order by the trial court to seek review under the court's superintendency powers of interlocutory matters where no post-trial relief would put the appealing party "in statu quo." Elder v. Commonwealth, 385 Mass. 128. 132 (1982). PARTIES 2. Your plaintiff, John G. Doe, is the defendant in the criminal action Comm. v. Doe, Docket Number 8853 CR 4268, in insert name of court. 3. Defendant is a department of the Trial Court of
the Commmonwealth of
FACTS 4. The judge determined on 19 October 1988 that Doe was marginally indigent, appointed him counsel through the Middlesex County Bar Advocate Program, and ordered Doe to contribute $250.00 toward attorney's fees by 4 November 1988. 5. Claiming that he was unable to pay the $250.00 by 4 November 1988, Doe made out a new probation "face sheet" on that date to recalculate his ability to pay and caused it to be brought before the presiding justice of the insert name of court. 6. The judge refused to lower the contribution ordered. 7. Doe then asked for more time to pay the $250.00,
which the judge had the discretion to allow implicitly under G.L. c. 211D
and Supreme Judicial Court Rule 3:10 and explicitly under the old Mass.R.Crim.P.
Rule 33(f)(2), which allowed for payment in a lump sum or in installments
over a duration which did not impede
8. The judge re-determined that Doe falls into category b of S.J.C. Rule 3, i.e., is indigent but able to contribute. 9. The judge refused to extend the time, ordered Doe's appointed counsel to withdraw, and ordered Doe to appear on Tuesday, 8 November 1988, either pro se or with private counsel, in violation of S.J.C. Rule 4, which allows the judge to order the case to proceed without defense counsel only if the defendant is found to be neither indigent nor marginally indigent. 10. Doe then requested to exercise his right to a first-instance jury trial. 11. The judge refused to allow Breen to exercise his right to proceed to the jury session prior to payment of the $250.00 fee assessed. 12. Doe at no time waived either orally or in writing his right to a first-instance jury trial. 13. Counsel at no time filed her written withdrawal from the case. 14. On behalf of Doe, immediately following the proceeding, defense counsel completed a Cassette Copy Order Form, Order Number 17425, so that she could attach to this complaint a copy of the relevant portion of the proceeding as evidence of what transpired below. 15. The clerk-magistrate's office then refused to accept the order on the grounds that defense counsel had been ordered to enter her withdrawal at the end of the proceeding. 16. Counsel re-iterated that she had been counsel at the time of the proceeding, that Doe was entitled to a copy of the tape of the proceeding, and that Doe was entitled to have her request the tape on his behalf. WHEREFORE, your Plaintiff requests this Honorable Court
to grant the
1. Stay the afore-mentioned proceedings in the insert name of court pending a final determination of this Complaint by this Court.Respectfully submitted, By his attorney, Date: ____________
_________________________________
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, insert your name,
hereby certify that on insert date, I served
by hand/by first class mail, postage prepaid, a copy of both the MOTION
FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE insert name of court
and the COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
AND TO
insert date
___________ Your signature____________
|