|
|
|
Answers to Requests for Admissions NOTE NOTE |
|
|
|
|
||
|
COUNTY,
SS.
NAME OF COURT Name(s) of Defendant(s) PLAINTIFF'S/DEFENDANT'S
RESPONSES TO
FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS REQUEST 1 Certain documents entitled "XYZ," copies of which are appended hereto and marked Exhibit A. Response to Request 1:John Doe can neither answer nor admit Request 1 as worded because . . .
Response to Request 2:John Doe can neither answer nor admit Request 2 as worded because . . .
Response to Request 3:John Doe admits that the two sheets marked Exhibit C are copies -- albeit almost illegible ones -- of copies of three checks his counsel attached to some pleadings in this case.REQUEST 4 Blah blah blah Response to Request 4: John Doe denies that the signature on the three checks making up Exhibit C are his.
Response to Request 5:John Doe has no memory of executing an application for a credit card account from Defendant. John Doe also states that the Request is in bad faith, because . . .
Response to Request 6: John Doe denies Request 6, for many reasons, amongst which it assumes the underlying facts are true, it implies that at any time since the beginning of time, Jason Smith and John Doe entered into an agreement. John Doe also states that the Request is in bad faith, because . . .
Response to Request 7:John Doe denies Request 7, for many reasons, several of which are (a) . . . , (b) . . . , (c) he never saw them, and (d) . . . .Signed under the pains and penalties of perjury |
||
|
Respectfully submitted,
PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANT, pro se
__________________________________ |
||
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE |
|
|